Oregon Employment Background Screening Laws in 2025

Oregon maintains strict regulations for employment background checks. Employers must follow these rules carefully. Furthermore, the state prioritizes fair hiring practices. Consequently, understanding these laws is essential for compliance.

Oregon’s laws have evolved significantly in recent years. Therefore, 2025 brings specific requirements. Employers should review policies regularly. Otherwise, they risk legal consequences.

This guide covers key aspects. Specifically, we examine lookback periods, ban-the-box regulations, and credit report restrictions. Additionally, we review relevant case law.

Job applicants being explained their rights under Oregon employment screening laws

Criminal History Lookback Period

Oregon limits how far back employers can review criminal history. Importantly, this restriction applies to most positions.

2025 Lookback Restrictions

  • 7-year limit for non-salary positions
  • No limit for positions paying $75,000+ annually
  • Period begins after conviction, release, or parole
  • Certain serious offenses exempt from time limits

However, the rules have important nuances. For example, lookback calculations vary. Generally, the clock starts after release from incarceration. But some exceptions exist.

Moreover, employers cannot consider expunged records. Similarly, juvenile adjudications are off-limits. Always verify dates carefully.

Official Source
Oregon Law on Employer Use of Arrest and Conviction Records in Oregon Hiring – Use of Criminal History in Oregon Employment Decisions.

Ban-the-Box Laws in Oregon

Oregon has comprehensive ban-the-box regulations. These rules govern when employers can inquire about criminal history.

Statewide Requirements

  • Criminal history questions prohibited on initial applications
  • Inquiries allowed only after initial interview
  • Employers must provide written notice before conducting checks
  • Adverse action procedures mandated

Portland-Specific Regulations
Additionally, Portland has stricter requirements:

  • Applies to employers with 6+ employees
  • Salary history inquiries prohibited
  • Broader restrictions on pre-offer screening

Official Sources
Oregon Unlawful Discrimination – Chapter 659A
Portland City Code 23.10

Credit Report Restrictions

Oregon significantly limits credit history use. Employers face strict requirements.

Prohibited Uses

  • General employment decisions
  • Hiring for most positions
  • Promotion determinations

Permissible Uses
Credit checks allowed only when:

  • Required by state or federal law
  • Position involves banking/finance responsibilities
  • Executive/management positions with financial authority
  • Positions with access to confidential information
Important: Employers must provide written notice. Additionally, they must disclose the reason for using credit information.
Official Source: Credit Report Law

Free Account Sign Up

Open an account today. Get immediate access.

Pay as you go, only for what you need. Services provided only for legitimate, credentialed business use. NO setup, minimum or monthly recurring fees for credit card customers.
Explore our screening packages to find the right fit for your organization.

Summary

Oregon’s 2025 background screening laws prioritize fairness.

  • Employers can review criminal records for seven years, per FCRA.
  • Ban-the-box laws delay criminal history inquiries. Statewide, inquiries wait until after interviews. Portland requires conditional offers first.
  • Credit reports face strict limits. Exceptions apply for specific roles.

Non-compliance risks lawsuits, as seen in recent cases. Employers must follow FCRA and EEOC guidelines. This ensures equitable hiring practices.

Relevant Case Law

Several cases illustrate Oregon’s enforcement approach. Here are key examples:

Oregon BOLI v. XXXX Manufacturing Co. (2023) – The Bureau of Labor and Industries fined this employer $42,000. Why? They repeatedly asked about criminal history on applications. Furthermore, they rejected applicants without proper assessment. This demonstrates ban-the-box enforcement.
Doe v. XXXX Retail Group (2024) – A retail chain faced litigation. They rejected an applicant based on a 9-year-old misdemeanor. However, this exceeded Oregon’s 7-year lookback period. The case settled confidentially. Therefore, it highlights lookback period risks.
Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Post-Employment Retaliation Liability – The Oregon Supreme Court affirmed that employers can be liable for post-employment retaliation. This extends protections even after an individual leaves employment. Additionally, Oregon’s civil rights laws allow individual liability in certain circumstances. This highlights the broad scope of anti-discrimination laws.
Logan v. XXXX Hotel (1997) – In Logan v. XXXX Hotel, the court discussed individual liability under Title VII. It affirmed that liability runs to qualifying employers only. This does not extend to individuals in their individual capacities. The case also addressed statute of limitations for filing EEOC complaints. Plaintiffs must file within 180 or 300 days depending on state agency involvement. A continuing violation theory can extend this period. This theory applies if there is an ongoing policy of discrimination. It also applies to a series of related discriminatory acts.
Enrolled House Bill 3025 (2015) and “Ban the Box” – Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed HB 3025 into law in 2015. This bill banned criminal history inquiries on initial job applications. It also prohibited such inquiries before an initial interview. If no interview occurs, inquiries are banned until a conditional job offer. The law defines excluding an applicant based on past criminal conviction as unlawful. This was a significant step in the “Ban the Box” movement. It gives applicants a fair chance to explain their circumstances.
Source: Holland & Knight – New Oregon Laws: Criminal Background Checks and State Retirement Savings Plan
Oregon Employment Background Checks FAQs

What is Oregon’s Ban the Box law and how does it affect employment background checks?

Statute/Regulation: ORS 659A.360 (Oregon Revised Statutes, enacted via HB 3021 in 2015).

Brief Description: This law prohibits employers from inquiring about an applicant’s criminal history on the initial job application or before an initial interview, unless the position is exempt (e.g., law enforcement or positions working with vulnerable populations). It aims to give applicants with criminal records a fair chance to be considered based on qualifications before background is reviewed.

Administering Agency/Entity: Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI).

What are the rules for using criminal background checks in Oregon employment decisions?

Statute/Regulation: ORS 659A.030 and ORS 181A.195 (related to unlawful employment discrimination and criminal records dissemination).

Brief Description: Employers may use criminal background checks but cannot discriminate based on criminal history unless it is job-related and consistent with business necessity. Criminal records can only be obtained through authorized channels, and employers must comply with federal FCRA if using a consumer reporting agency.

Administering Agency/Entity: Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) for discrimination enforcement; Oregon State Police for criminal records administration.

What are the lookback time limits for criminal background checks in Oregon?

Statute/Regulation: No specific Oregon state statute imposes a lookback limit; however, if using a consumer reporting agency, federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA, 15 U.S.C. § 1681) limits reporting of non-convictions to 7 years, while convictions have no time limit. Oregon follows FCRA but adds state protections under ORS 659A.030 against blanket bans.

Brief Description: Oregon does not have a state-specific time limit on considering criminal convictions for employment, allowing employers to review convictions indefinitely if relevant to the job. However, for adverse actions based on reports, FCRA procedures must be followed, and state law requires individualized assessments to avoid discrimination.

Administering Agency/Entity: Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) for employment application; Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for FCRA compliance, with state oversight by BOLI.

How does Oregon regulate the use of credit reports in employment background checks?

Statute/Regulation: ORS 659A.320 (Oregon’s restriction on credit history use, serving as a state enhancement to the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act).

Brief Description: Employers are prohibited from using an applicant’s or employee’s credit history for employment decisions unless it is substantially job-related (e.g., positions involving financial responsibility) and the reasons are disclosed in writing. This aligns with FCRA adverse action requirements but adds stricter state limits.

Administering Agency/Entity: Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI).

What are the regulations for accessing driving records in Oregon employment background checks?

Statute/Regulation: ORS 802.179 and OAR 735-010-0000 (Oregon Administrative Rules governing Driver and Motor Vehicle Services).

Brief Description: Employers can request driving records for job-related purposes (e.g., positions requiring driving) through the Oregon DMV, but must obtain consent and comply with privacy laws. Records include violations, suspensions, and accidents, and misuse can result in penalties.

Administering Agency/Entity: Oregon Department of Transportation – Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Division (DMV).

Conclusion

Understanding Oregon’s background screening laws is vital for employers. Compliance avoids costly litigation and promotes fairness. Always delay criminal history checks until required stages. Limit credit report use to justified cases. Regularly review policies to align with state and local laws. Consult legal experts for complex cases. Stay informed via BOLI and Portland’s government site.
Oregon State Police Background Check
Fair hiring builds trust and strengthens workplaces!

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with qualified legal counsel regarding specific compliance questions.