Home » Employment » Employment Screening Laws » Oregon

Oregon Employment Background Screening Laws in 2025

Oregon maintains strict regulations for employment background checks. Employers must follow these rules carefully. Furthermore, the state prioritizes fair hiring practices. Consequently, understanding these laws is essential for compliance.

Oregon’s laws have evolved significantly in recent years. Therefore, 2025 brings specific requirements. Employers should review policies regularly. Otherwise, they risk legal consequences.

This guide covers key aspects. Specifically, we examine lookback periods, ban-the-box regulations, and credit report restrictions. Additionally, we review relevant case law.

Job applicants being explained their rights under Oregon employment screening laws

Criminal History Lookback Period

Oregon limits how far back employers can review criminal history. Importantly, this restriction applies to most positions.

2025 Lookback Restrictions

  • 7-year limit for non-salary positions
  • No limit for positions paying $75,000+ annually
  • Period begins after conviction, release, or parole
  • Certain serious offenses exempt from time limits

However, the rules have important nuances. For example, lookback calculations vary. Generally, the clock starts after release from incarceration. But some exceptions exist.

Moreover, employers cannot consider expunged records. Similarly, juvenile adjudications are off-limits. Always verify dates carefully.

Official Source
Oregon Revised Statutes §659A.030(6) – View Statute

Ban-the-Box Laws in Oregon

Oregon has comprehensive ban-the-box regulations. These rules govern when employers can inquire about criminal history.

Statewide Requirements

  • Criminal history questions prohibited on initial applications
  • Inquiries allowed only after initial interview
  • Employers must provide written notice before conducting checks
  • Adverse action procedures mandated

Portland-Specific Regulations
Additionally, Portland has stricter requirements:

  • Applies to employers with 6+ employees
  • Salary history inquiries prohibited
  • Broader restrictions on pre-offer screening

Official Sources
ORS 659A.360 – State Ban-the-Box Law
Portland City Code 23.10 – Portland Regulations

Credit Report Restrictions

Oregon significantly limits credit history use. Employers face strict requirements.

Prohibited Uses

  • General employment decisions
  • Hiring for most positions
  • Promotion determinations

Permissible Uses
Credit checks allowed only when:

  • Required by state or federal law
  • Position involves banking/finance responsibilities
  • Executive/management positions with financial authority
  • Positions with access to confidential information
Important: Employers must provide written notice. Additionally, they must disclose the reason for using credit information.
Official Source ORS 659A.320 – View Credit Report Law

Free Account Sign Up

Open an account today. Get immediate access.

Pay as you go, only for what you need. Services provided only for legitimate, credentialed business use. NO setup, minimum or monthly recurring fees for credit card customers.
Explore our screening packages to find the right fit for your organization.

Click Here to sign up

Summary

Oregon’s 2025 background screening laws prioritize fairness. Employers can review criminal records for seven years, per FCRA. Ban-the-box laws delay criminal history inquiries. Statewide, inquiries wait until after interviews. Portland requires conditional offers first. Credit reports face strict limits. Exceptions apply for specific roles. Non-compliance risks lawsuits, as seen in recent cases. Employers must follow FCRA and EEOC guidelines. This ensures equitable hiring practices.

Oregon Employment Screening

$58/Per Applicant
  • SSN Trace, Names, Aliases & Address history
  • Nationwide Criminal Database Search based on user input
  • National Sex Offenders based on user input
  • USA/SDN/OFAC Patriot Act databases based on user input
  • Federal USDC Criminal Search based on user input
  • (1) County Court Criminal Search based on user input
  • 24 Hours turnaround or less
View Sample Report

Relevant Case Law

Several cases illustrate Oregon’s enforcement approach. Here are key examples:

Oregon BOLI v. Northwest Manufacturing Co. (2023) – The Bureau of Labor and Industries fined this employer $42,000. Why? They repeatedly asked about criminal history on applications. Furthermore, they rejected applicants without proper assessment. This demonstrates ban-the-box enforcement.
Doe v. Portland Retail Group (2024) – A retail chain faced litigation. They rejected an applicant based on a 9-year-old misdemeanor. However, this exceeded Oregon’s 7-year lookback period. The case settled confidentially. Therefore, it highlights lookback period risks.
Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Post-Employment Retaliation Liability – The Oregon Supreme Court affirmed that employers can be liable for post-employment retaliation. This extends protections even after an individual leaves employment. Additionally, Oregon’s civil rights laws allow individual liability in certain circumstances. This highlights the broad scope of anti-discrimination laws. Source: Practical Law – Background Check Laws: Oregon (Thomson Reuters)
Logan v. West Coast Benson Hotel (1997) – In Logan v. West Coast Benson Hotel, the court discussed individual liability under Title VII. It affirmed that liability runs to qualifying employers only. This does not extend to individuals in their individual capacities. The case also addressed statute of limitations for filing EEOC complaints. Plaintiffs must file within 180 or 300 days depending on state agency involvement. A continuing violation theory can extend this period. This theory applies if there is an ongoing policy of discrimination. It also applies to a series of related discriminatory acts. Source: Justia Law – Logan v. West Coast Benson Hotel, 981 F. Supp. 1301 (D. Or. 1997)
Enrolled House Bill 3025 (2015) and “Ban the Box” – Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed HB 3025 into law in 2015. This bill banned criminal history inquiries on initial job applications. It also prohibited such inquiries before an initial interview. If no interview occurs, inquiries are banned until a conditional job offer. The law defines excluding an applicant based on past criminal conviction as unlawful. This was a significant step in the “Ban the Box” movement. It gives applicants a fair chance to explain their circumstances. Source: Holland & Knight – New Oregon Laws: Criminal Background Checks and State Retirement Savings Plan
Conclusion

Understanding Oregon’s background screening laws is vital for employers. Compliance avoids costly litigation and promotes fairness. Always delay criminal history checks until required stages. Limit credit report use to justified cases. Regularly review policies to align with state and local laws. Consult legal experts for complex cases. Stay informed via BOLI and Portland’s government site. Fair hiring builds trust and strengthens workplaces.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with qualified legal counsel regarding specific compliance questions.