Home » Background Searches » State Criminal » Arizona
 

Arizona Criminal Records – Arizona Judicial Branch

State of Arizona laws for hiring and rejecting job applicants involve a combination of federal, state, and local regulations that employers must follow to ensure compliance, fairness, and nondiscrimination.

Below is a comprehensive overview of the key laws and requirements related to pre-employment screening in Arizona, based on the most relevant and up-to-date 2025 information

Arizona criminal records

Open an account today. Get immediate access.

Pay as you go, only for what you need. Services provided only for legitimate, credentialed business use. NO setup, minimum or monthly recurring fees for credit card customers.

  • Felonies and misdemeanors court cases are updated daily
  • Turnaround time is 24 hours or less
  • Price $20.00 + Repository Fee

View other States

Arizona Employment Screening Laws in 2025

1. Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) applies to Arizona employers using consumer reports (e.g., background checks, credit reports) for hiring. Key requirements include:
Authorization and Disclosure: Employers must obtain written consent from the applicant before conducting a background check. A standalone disclosure form, separate from the job application, must inform the applicant of the screening. The Gilberg v. Cal. Check Cashing Stores ruling (applicable to Arizona as part of the Ninth Circuit) mandates two standalone forms: one for FCRA compliance and another for state-specific disclosures.
Adverse Action Process: If an employer decides not to hire based on the background check:
Provide a pre-adverse action notice, including a copy of the report and a summary of FCRA rights.
Allow the applicant time to dispute inaccuracies.
Lookback Periods: Non-conviction criminal information (e.g., arrests without convictions) is limited to a seven-year lookback period, but convictions can be reported indefinitely.
Important: Send a final adverse action notice if the decision stands.

2. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Nondiscrimination: Title VII, enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, and other protected characteristics.
When using criminal history in hiring decisions, employers must:
Evaluate criminal records on an individual basis, considering the nature of the offense, its relevance to the job, and the time elapsed since the offense.
Avoid blanket policies excluding applicants with criminal records, as this may disproportionately impact protected groups (e.g., African Americans or Latinos), potentially leading to claims of disparate impact discrimination.
EEOC Guidance: Employers should ensure criminal history inquiries are job-related and consistent with business necessity.

3. Arizona Civil Rights Act
The Arizona Civil Rights Act mirrors federal protections, prohibiting discrimination in hiring based on race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin for employers with 15 or more employees.
Employers may ask about prior convictions but must include a statement that a conviction is not an automatic bar to employment. This ensures applicants are not unfairly excluded based on criminal history.
Documents revealing protected information (e.g., birth certificates) should not be requested before a conditional job offer.

4. Ban the Box Laws
State-Level: Arizona has no statewide “ban the box” law for private employers. However, Executive Order 2017-07 prohibits certain state agencies from inquiring about criminal history on job applications until after an initial interview, except for positions where state or federal law bars individuals with certain convictions.
Local Jurisdictions: Some Arizona localities have adopted fair hiring policies:
Glendale, Pima County, Tempe, and Tucson have banned the box for city job applications, delaying criminal history inquiries until after a conditional offer or interview.
Maricopa County delays background checks until after a conditional offer is accepted, with conviction data limited to the past seven years.
Private employers are not subject to these local rules but should be aware of them if contracting with public entities.

5. Drug Testing Laws
Pre-Employment Drug Testing: Arizona employers may require drug tests as a condition of employment but are not obligated to do so. Applicants must be informed of the testing requirement, and refusal to test may result in a decision not to hire.
Procedural Requirements: Employers must follow state procedures for sample collection, testing, and confidentiality. Positive results must be confirmed by a second test using a different method.
Medical Marijuana: The Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (AMMA) protects registered cardholders from discrimination based solely on a positive marijuana test, unless:
The employer would lose federal funding or licensing.
The employee used, possessed, or was impaired by marijuana at work.
The position is safety-sensitive, allowing restrictions on medical marijuana use.
Recreational Marijuana: Employers may take adverse action against non-cardholders testing positive for recreational marijuana, as Arizona law offers little protection for recreational users.
Privacy Concerns: Supervised drug tests may raise privacy issues, and employers must ensure tests are conducted lawfully. Discriminating based on legally prescribed medications for disabilities (protected under the ADA) may lead to legal claims.

6. E-Verify and Immigration Status
The Legal Arizona Workers Act (LAWA) requires all employers to use E-Verify to verify the employment eligibility of new hires after December 31, 2007. Records of verification must be maintained for three years or the duration of employment, whichever is longer.
Employers are prohibited from knowingly or intentionally hiring unauthorized workers, with penalties including suspension or revocation of business licenses.
Inquiries about immigration status must avoid questions about national origin to comply with nondiscrimination laws.

7. Criminal Record Expungement (Senate Bill 1504)
Passed in 2020, Senate Bill 1504 allows certain criminal records to be expunged or sealed, affecting what appears in background checks. Employers should ensure their screening processes account for sealed or expunged records, which may no longer be reportable.

8. Industry-Specific Requirements
Certain roles, such as childcare workers, school bus drivers, or positions involving vulnerable populations, require mandatory background checks, often including fingerprint-based criminal history checks.
Safety-sensitive positions (e.g., those with access to select agents under federal law or residence hall rooms) may require more extensive screenings, including fingerprint checks.

9. Credit Checks
Employers may conduct credit checks for relevant positions (e.g., financial roles) but must comply with FCRA requirements, including obtaining written consent and following adverse action procedures.
Credit information must be used in a nondiscriminatory manner and be job-related.

10. Best Practices for Compliance
Clear Policies: Adopt and communicate clear background check and drug testing policies to applicants and employees.
Individualized Assessments: Follow EEOC guidance by assessing criminal history on a case-by-case basis, considering the job’s requirements and the candidate’s rehabilitation.
Consult Legal Counsel: Given the complexity of overlapping laws, consult an employment law attorney for specific guidance, especially for drug testing, criminal history, or immigration-related inquiries.

Notes
Arizona’s employment laws are subject to change, and local ordinances may impose additional requirements. Employers should regularly review updates to state and local regulations. The information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult legal counsel for specific compliance questions.

Arizona Criminal Records Report

Viewing on a mobile device or small screen? View PDF version

 

Case Information
Case Type:
Criminal
Location:
Downtown
Party Information
Party Name –
Number
Relationship
Sex
Attorney
Judge
Case #
State Of Arizona –
(1)
Plaintiff
N/A
County Attorney,
Maricopa
John Wilson
Doe – (2)
DOB: 05/27/1968
Defendant
M
Mason, Perry
Ian T. Spencer
CR2014-958425-001
Clerk Of The Court –
(3)
In The Matter Of
N/A
To Be Determined
Disposition Information
Party Name
ARSCode
Description
Crime Date
Disposition
Code
Disposition
Date
John Wilson Doe
13-2002 (F4)
FORGERY
2/24/2014
Dismissed Due To
Grand Jury Indictment
Dismissed Due To
Grand Jury Indictment
5/3/2014
John Wilson Doe
13-2006 (F6)
CRIMINAL
IMPERSONATION
2/24/2014
Pled to Reduced
Charge
Pled Guilty To Reduced
Charge
5/3/2014
Case Documents
Filing Date
Description
Docket Date
Filing Party
5/16/2014
DRE – Disposition
Report – Party
(001)
05/21/2014
5/3/2014
105 – ME:
Plea Agreement/Change
Of Plea –
Party (001)
05/3/2014
5/3/2014
109 – ME:
Sentence –
Probation –
Party (001)
05/3/2014
4/27/2014
152 – ME:
Not Guilty Plea
Arraign –
Party (001)
05/3/2014
4/27/2014
TCP – Terms &
Conditions Of Probation/Money
Ordered –
Party (001)
05/4/2014
4/27/2014
PAG – Plea
Agreement –
Party (001)
05/29/2014
4/27/2014
NRR – Notice
Of Rights Of Review –
Party (001)
05/30/2014
4/27/2014
056 – ME:
Hearing Set –
Party (001)
04/27/2014
4/12/2014
STA – Statement –
Party (001) NOTE:
RULE 15.2 DISCLOSURE
04/16/2014
4/12/2014
REQ – Request –
Party (001) NOTE:
FOR PRODUCTION OF
EVIDENCE
04/16/2014
4/12/2014
NAR – Notice
Of Appearance –
Party (001)
04/13/2014
4/12/2014
NSI – Notice
of Supervening Indictment –
Party (001)
04/13/2014
Plaintiff (1)
4/12/2014
IND – Indictment –
Party (001)
04/13/2014
Plaintiff (1)
4/12/2014
606 – ME:
GJ Not/Supervening
Indictment –
Party (001)
04/13/2014
4/11/2014
IAD – Initial
Appearance Document –
Party (001)
04/16/2014
4/9/2014
DCO – Direct
Complaint –
Party (001)
04/9/2014
Case Calendar
Date
Time
Event
4/13/2014
8:30
Preliminary Hearing
4/23/2014
8:30
Original Arraignment
Hearing
4/27/2014
8:30
Evidentiary Hearing
4/27/2014
8:31
Sentencing
5/23/2014
8:15
Initial Pretrial
Conference

 

Search other states